Skip to main content

More indications of positive change from the Journal of the AMA

Who would have thought that the Journal of the AMA would be an agent of positive social change? The AMA has, for me, symbolized the most frighteningly powerful aspects of organized medicine, and its trade journal, the JAMA has been one of the big 3 (with the New England Journal and the Annals of Internal Medicine) vehicles for presentation of relevant cutting edge clinical research. But since health care reform has been in the news the JAMA has offered many well considered opinion articles about how best to make American medicine serve the people.

The lead article this week presented research in the area of surgical treatment for spinal stenosis.  Spinal stenosis is a common and disabling subset of what people think of as "a nerve pinched in my back".  Patients with spinal stenosis have bony growth or disc protrusion into their spinal canal in such a way that the spinal cord is crowded, leading to pain down a leg, or both legs, with exertion or in certain postures.  It has been pretty successfully treated for many years with decompression and sometimes fusion of the vertebrae involved.  In recent years there have been advances in the field of spine surgery and now the vertebral column is sometimes stabilized with complex and expensive hardware, and sometimes the bone growth is enhanced with the use of bone growth proteins.  This has allowed surgery to be successful in very complex cases, including cases in which there is spinal deformity such as severe scoliosis.  Use of these new technologies, however, is extremely expensive, and cases in which the new technologies are used have a higher complication rate.  This would be acceptable if the new technologies were only used for the complex cases, but now the new technologies are very commonly used, resulting in an increase in cost for surgical treatment of spinal stenosis from about $23,000 for the standard procedure and hospitalization to over $80,000 for the complicated version, with a relative risk for complications, including death, that is nearly 2 and a half times that of the less complicated surgery.  The factors that lead to increase in use of the more complex surgeries include the fact that medical device manufacturers advertise the superiority of these procedures (which involve the use of hardware that can cost upwards of $50,000 per case) as well as fact that a surgeon may be reimbursed $600-$800 dollars for the simpler surgery and up to 10 times that for the more complex surgery.

What, you might ask, is positive about that story? What is positive is that it is the lead article in the JAMA and that there is an editorial by Jay Lemery which neither apologizes for or rationalizes the findings. The conclusions, in fact, of the editorial are that patients and surgeons and payors need to carefully assess the value and risks of new technologies, and that market forces, such as they are, do not favor careful assessment. Tell it, brother!

Only 4 pages away from this editorial is another opinion piece with the title "Moving Reform to the Bedside." The authors, Drs. Erica Spatz and Cary Gross, say that doctors should start reforming health care themselves, without waiting for legislators to do it for them.  They suggest that doctors use the tools we have to provide good quality care that is based on evidence of what works, when there is such evidence, and that we consider costs when deciding which tests and medications to use. They suggest involving patients in making decisions, and even talking to them about why health care reform is necessary and how these changes might occur. They suggest that we become involved with creative ways to allow access to health care in our communities, and that we avoid being seduced into free lunches and other goodies by representatives of drug and device companies.  None of this is new, in fact most of these pieces of advice can be found somewhere in the archives of this blog, but it is INCREDIBLY GRATIFYING to see them in an editorial in the Journal of that bastion of organized medicine, the American Medical Association.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to make your own ultrasound gel (which is also sterile and edible and environmentally friendly) **UPDATED--NEW RECIPE**

I have been doing lots of bedside ultrasound lately and realized how useful it would be in areas far off the beaten track like Haiti, for instance. With a bedside ultrasound (mine fits in my pocket) I could diagnose heart disease, kidney and gallbladder problems, various cancers as well as lung and intestinal diseases. Then I realized that I would have to take a whole bunch of ultrasound gel with me which would mean that I would have to check luggage, which is a real pain when traveling light to a place where luggage disappears. I heard that you can use water, or spit, in a pinch, or even lotion, though oil based coupling media apparently break down the surface of the transducer. Or, of course, you can just use ultrasound gel. Ultrasound requires an aqueous interface between the transducer and the skin or else all you see is black. Ultrasound gel is a clear goo, looks like hair gel or aloe vera, and is made by several companies out of various combinations of propylene glycol, glyce...

Ivermectin for Covid--Does it work? We don't know.

  Lately there has been quite a heated controversy about whether to use ivermectin for Covid-19.  The FDA , a US federal agency responsible for providing unbiased information to protect people from harmful drugs, foods, even tobacco products, has said that there is not good evidence of ivermectin's safety and effectiveness in treating Covid 19, and that just about sums up what we truly know about ivermectin in the context of Covid. The CDC, Centers for Disease Control, a branch of the department of Health and Human Services, tasked with preventing and treating disease and injury, also recently warned  people not to use ivermectin to treat Covid outside of actual clinical trials. Certain highly qualified physicians, including ones who practice critical care medicine and manage many patients with severe Covid infections in the intensive care unit vocally support the use of ivermectin to treat Covid and have published dosing schedules and reviews of the literature supporting...

Actinic Keratoses and Carac (fluorouracil) cream: why is this so expensive?

First, a disclaimer: I don't know why Carac (0.5% flourouracil cream) is so expensive. I will speculate, though, at the very end of this blog. Sun and the skin: what happens If a person reaches a certain age, has very little pigment in her skin, and has spent lots of time in the sun, bad stuff happens. The ultraviolet radiation of the sun does all kinds of great things: it makes us happy, causes us to synthesize vitamin D which strengthens our bones and it gives us this healthy glow until we get old and wrinkled and leathery. And even that can be charming. The skin cells put up with this remarkably well for a long time, partly aided by melanin pigment which absorbs the radiation, which is why we tan and freckle, if we are fair skinned. Eventually, though, we absorb enough radiation that it injures the skin and produces cells which multiply oddly. It also damages the skin's elasticity which creates wrinkles. The cells which reproduce in odd ways peel, creating dry skin or...