Skip to main content

When do we get our free preventive health care?

One of the most exasperating things about the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as health care reform) is the fact that its many provisions don’t just start immediately, but rather are phased in over a really long period and at seemingly random intervals.

As a physician, I often hear my insured patients say things like “I can’t afford a colonoscopy right now” or “how much will a mammogram cost me?” I tell them that with the health care reform legislation they won’t have to pay for either one of these things. Unfortunately, my response has been a misleading oversimplification.

It is true that one of the most welcome parts of the Affordable Care Act is that recommended preventive care services will be paid for in full, without co-pays or cost sharing. But when?

Medicare and Medicaid programs will begin covering preventive care services at 100% on January 1, 2011. The services included are at this link: http://www.healthcare.gov/law/about/provisions/services/lists.html

Private insurance companies have a year from the passage of the law to comply with this provision. So if you are privately insured, you may need to wait for several more months.

But what about the people who are told by their insurance companies, that, no, they don’t have coverage for colonoscopies or pap smears or flu shots or smoking cessation counseling or any of that stuff? Doesn’t the law apply to everybody?

Because the health care reform law had to allow people to keep the insurance coverage they had if they wanted to keep it, certain policies are “grandfathered” so that they remain the same as they were at or prior to March 14, 2010. Any insurance policy that a person maintains continuously, that doesn’t change its provisions in any significant way, can continue to not provide fully covered preventive care services. If the policy changes its coverage limits or the services it covers, that policy is no longer grandfathered and must fully comply with the law.

Most of the other provisions of the health care reform package do apply to these grandfathered policies, except for the fact that an individually insured person who was not covered for a pre-existing condition that was excluded will remain that way, and that there may not be full coverage for visits to pediatricians or gynecologists.


Why would a person want to stay insured under one of these grandfathered policies? Probably because the private health insurance companies are at this point doing their very best to increase the prices on new policies before many of the other provisions of the act go into effect in 2014 and thus the cost of the newly created policies that conform to the new law is pretty steep, in many instances. Private health insurance is presently going from wickedly expensive to unaffordable for many Americans. Keeping one’s old policy, even with nasty rate hikes may be the only option many people see open to them.

Why do health insurance companies not voluntarily cover preventive services? Surely it saves them money to prevent rather than treat disease. Unfortunately that is not always true. If all women received mammogram screening at recommended intervals, the cost per year of life saved would be 40-50,000 dollars. If a person doesn’t receive timely screening, the breast cancer that results might be expensive to treat, but that will be offset by the many women who never had mammograms. In addition, some people who are not screened for disease die quickly and relatively inexpensively. Those who survive will likely be costlier to treat in the future. It is not in the best interest of an insurance company whose motive is profit to aggressively screen for most diseases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to make your own ultrasound gel (which is also sterile and edible and environmentally friendly) **UPDATED--NEW RECIPE**

I have been doing lots of bedside ultrasound lately and realized how useful it would be in areas far off the beaten track like Haiti, for instance. With a bedside ultrasound (mine fits in my pocket) I could diagnose heart disease, kidney and gallbladder problems, various cancers as well as lung and intestinal diseases. Then I realized that I would have to take a whole bunch of ultrasound gel with me which would mean that I would have to check luggage, which is a real pain when traveling light to a place where luggage disappears. I heard that you can use water, or spit, in a pinch, or even lotion, though oil based coupling media apparently break down the surface of the transducer. Or, of course, you can just use ultrasound gel. Ultrasound requires an aqueous interface between the transducer and the skin or else all you see is black. Ultrasound gel is a clear goo, looks like hair gel or aloe vera, and is made by several companies out of various combinations of propylene glycol, glyce

Ivermectin for Covid--Does it work? We don't know.

  Lately there has been quite a heated controversy about whether to use ivermectin for Covid-19.  The FDA , a US federal agency responsible for providing unbiased information to protect people from harmful drugs, foods, even tobacco products, has said that there is not good evidence of ivermectin's safety and effectiveness in treating Covid 19, and that just about sums up what we truly know about ivermectin in the context of Covid. The CDC, Centers for Disease Control, a branch of the department of Health and Human Services, tasked with preventing and treating disease and injury, also recently warned  people not to use ivermectin to treat Covid outside of actual clinical trials. Certain highly qualified physicians, including ones who practice critical care medicine and manage many patients with severe Covid infections in the intensive care unit vocally support the use of ivermectin to treat Covid and have published dosing schedules and reviews of the literature supporting it for tr

Old Fangak, South Sudan--Bedside Ultrasound and other stuff

I just got back from a couple of weeks in Old Fangak, a community of people living by the Zaraf River in South Sudan. It's normally a small community, with an open market and people who live by raising cows, trading on the river, fishing and gardening. Now there are tens of thousands of people there, still displaced from their homes by the civil war which has gone on intermittently for decades. There are even more people now than there were last year. There is a hospital in Old Fangak, which is run by Jill Seaman, one of the founders of Sudan Medical relief and a fierce advocate for treatment of various horrible and neglected tropical diseases, along with some very skilled and committed local clinical officers and nurses and a contingent of doctors, nurses and support staff from Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders, also known as MSF) who have been helping out for a little over a year. The hospital attempts to do a lot with a little, and treats all who present ther