Skip to main content

Covid-19 Quarantine: are we afraid of going back?

It is 2 weeks since Governor Brad Little of Idaho issued a statewide "stay at home" order and about 3 weeks since my little town has been staying at home because of an earlier mayor's order. The whole US has been increasingly moving toward self quarantining. People throughout the world are being asked to avoid sharing space and sharing germs with others. Buying and selling and traveling aren't happening much. There is very little going to school, receiving non-essential services, partying, touching or breathing on people outside of our immediate biological or chosen families.

Some people are getting bored. Many are feeling challenged by having to do things that aren't normal for them, things like cooking, cleaning, childcare. Many of the things that filled our days are just not happening. There is a whole lot of quiet.

The creativity that is happening in the absence of whatever it was we used to do is pretty stupendous. People are writing for each other and making music. They are doing crafts and sharing the how-to's online. Very rich people have nothing much to do with their money and are donating it to causes or initiating projects aimed at improving the situation, but also improving the world in general.

There are also new and familiar terrible things going on such as the poor getting poorer and relationships strained to breaking because of too much togetherness. Some people are drinking too much alcohol or doing too many drugs or gaming until their eyes cross and they develop bedsores on their nether parts. We all react to stresses in different ways.

Skies are going from dirty brown to brighter shades of blue as air pollution from factories and cars recedes. Pandas are mating in a spectator-free zoo for the first time in I'm not sure how long. Wildlife is coming back to cities. We are producing much less carbon dioxide and much less waste in general.

In medicine, my field, all kinds of changes are happening. In places where people brought the novel coronavirus from distant parts and then mixed with other people in close quarters, places like New Orleans, New York and Detroit, hospitals are hopping and people are dying partly due to having overwhelmed the medical system. But in these busy places, doctors and nurses and aides and administrators are using ingenuity to solve problems that have been around forever but are now critical. In smaller towns we are slower to experience the epidemics and are still in a state of quiet waiting. Few people are seeing doctors for problems that don't seem to need immediate care. My days are slow and I am able to concentrate fully on each patient I see (or talk to, as the case may be.) It's a little eerie.

We have all made changes. My colleagues and I are talking to patients on the phone or seeing them on a video monitor rather than bringing them in to the clinic where they can infect us and we can infect them. It is not ideal, but it is not terrible. In fact, some of these "virtual visits" are more appropriate for a patient than coming in. In hospitals physicians and staff need to conserve personal protective gear like masks and gowns and so they are batching care, one person will bring in a meal tray, check a blood sugar, hook up an IV bag, pass a medicine, draw a blood test, change a dressing, all in one fell swoop. One person, one exposure, one set of protective gear. Also this is great for a patient who usually gets disturbed and woken many times in a day, interrupting the rest that would be healing. This means that we do need to adjust our dosing of medication so it corresponds to mealtimes, but it turns out that works just fine.

Some hospitalists who are at higher risk of infection or who need to self quarantine work from home to provide night coverage. They can take calls from the hospital about routine questions, allowing the doctor in the hospital to sleep or concentrate on work at the bedside.

Good stuff, but also balanced by alarming economic devastation, with huge numbers of people suddenly unemployed with no obvious way to pay for necessities. Despots are grabbing power and painting human rights as optional. Leaders are undoubtedly getting away with all sorts of hanky panky while citizens are otherwise distracted. There is the ongoing tragedy of disability, pain and death from the disease itself.

And also the very real strangeness for all of us, as social and tribal animals, now unable to casually touch and mingle.

We are all ready for this to be over. But maybe not...

Besides wanting some of what we had before being told to stay at home, many people voice that they don't want to return to the way things were. I think people are a little worried that we won't have learned anything. That we will return to wasteful excesses of travel and spending and expensive oversized sparkliness. That we will forget that we are all so very connected when there is no deadly virus to connect us. No worries. We will not be going back. It is not at all clear what the configuration of the world will be when this is all over, but Covid-19 has become part of who we are.

These are a few of the things that can't be undone:

  1. We have found out that at least some of us can get a lot of things done from home, without going in to work. This saves resources of many kinds: fuel for commuting, office space at which to confine us, childcare...We can be more flexible with work hours which would allow us to serve working people better and coordinate with colleagues in different time zones. Businesses would have to be crazy not to take advantage of this.
  2. We have noticed that we don't need to spend so much money. Many of us have been spending much less money in the last few weeks by not going anywhere. As a world, we are also not doing some of the very costly things that we did do, things like the Olympics or big conventions or professional sports. It will be nice to have some of that back for sure, but we will have survived just fine without it. This will have a durable economic effect. If we spend less money, we need less money and that means that we don't really have to work as hard or as long. It won't be seamless (people in poverty will still need to work just as hard because they had no excess spending) but overall we know we can consume less so we can also produce less.
  3. In healthcare we have proven that leaving a significant number of people without access is neither humane nor practical. That a business model for delivering care, with a workforce just large enough to take care of our usual number of patients, minimizing infrastructure and lacking the ability to expand will leave us in a terrible situation at times like this. We will have to see that it is very expensive as well as tragic when we do this wrong.
  4. We have learned that there is an astounding generosity of spirit among regular people: generosity of time, money and courage. That we can do amazing things when we really want to, and we really want to take care of each other.

Comments

Betsy Dickow said…
I love your blog!
And send love,
Bets
herbert said…
Re point #3: it's clear- or should be- that medicine being practiced like "just in time" manufacturing doesn't work. All "for-profit" businesses hate redundancy, though... so where will the occasional need for backup (practitioners, mostly.. & supplies) come from?We used to have a volunteer fire department here... but now have a paid force, with (mostly) volunteer EMTs. Here in a rural place that will probably be sufficient... but in the cities that's a tougher assignment.

Re #2: discovering that we don't need as much ordinarily means that the 'surplus' becomes a commodity, and provides additional profits (for those "in control"). Ultimately, a shorter individual work week & more people working would be a "plus" for those of us in the "employee" class... but that doesn't sit well with the "efficiency experts"-- who often promote paying people overtime, rather than adding new hires. At some point, if there are humane industrialists, they will have to shed that maxim of the Industrial Revolution-- that "using mechanization as a way to do more with fewer employees". Robotics is ending a need for labor, at a time when world population shows no signs of abating... or even leveling off. What can we do about this?

My own hippie mantra- When in doubt, do Without"- will only work for the few who can eschew the ad-frenzy & capitalist bombardment of messaging designed to lure me into the paradigm of "modern life": Be a happy consumer!

(Hmmm... I'll think about it...) ^..^

Popular posts from this blog

How to make your own ultrasound gel (which is also sterile and edible and environmentally friendly) **UPDATED--NEW RECIPE**

I have been doing lots of bedside ultrasound lately and realized how useful it would be in areas far off the beaten track like Haiti, for instance. With a bedside ultrasound (mine fits in my pocket) I could diagnose heart disease, kidney and gallbladder problems, various cancers as well as lung and intestinal diseases. Then I realized that I would have to take a whole bunch of ultrasound gel with me which would mean that I would have to check luggage, which is a real pain when traveling light to a place where luggage disappears. I heard that you can use water, or spit, in a pinch, or even lotion, though oil based coupling media apparently break down the surface of the transducer. Or, of course, you can just use ultrasound gel. Ultrasound requires an aqueous interface between the transducer and the skin or else all you see is black. Ultrasound gel is a clear goo, looks like hair gel or aloe vera, and is made by several companies out of various combinations of propylene glycol, glyce

Ivermectin for Covid--Does it work? We don't know.

  Lately there has been quite a heated controversy about whether to use ivermectin for Covid-19.  The FDA , a US federal agency responsible for providing unbiased information to protect people from harmful drugs, foods, even tobacco products, has said that there is not good evidence of ivermectin's safety and effectiveness in treating Covid 19, and that just about sums up what we truly know about ivermectin in the context of Covid. The CDC, Centers for Disease Control, a branch of the department of Health and Human Services, tasked with preventing and treating disease and injury, also recently warned  people not to use ivermectin to treat Covid outside of actual clinical trials. Certain highly qualified physicians, including ones who practice critical care medicine and manage many patients with severe Covid infections in the intensive care unit vocally support the use of ivermectin to treat Covid and have published dosing schedules and reviews of the literature supporting it for tr

Old Fangak, South Sudan--Bedside Ultrasound and other stuff

I just got back from a couple of weeks in Old Fangak, a community of people living by the Zaraf River in South Sudan. It's normally a small community, with an open market and people who live by raising cows, trading on the river, fishing and gardening. Now there are tens of thousands of people there, still displaced from their homes by the civil war which has gone on intermittently for decades. There are even more people now than there were last year. There is a hospital in Old Fangak, which is run by Jill Seaman, one of the founders of Sudan Medical relief and a fierce advocate for treatment of various horrible and neglected tropical diseases, along with some very skilled and committed local clinical officers and nurses and a contingent of doctors, nurses and support staff from Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders, also known as MSF) who have been helping out for a little over a year. The hospital attempts to do a lot with a little, and treats all who present ther